In abstract algebra, a representation of an associative algebra is a module for that algebra. Here an associative algebra is a (not necessarily unital) ring. If the algebra is not unital, it may be made so in a standard way (see the adjoint functors page); there is no essential difference between modules for the resulting unital ring, in which the identity acts by the identity mapping, and representations of the algebra.
Contents |
One of the simplest non-trivial examples is a linear complex structure, which is a representation of the complex numbers C, thought of as associative algebra over the real numbers R. This algebra is realized concretely as which corresponds to Then a representation of C is a real vector space V, together with an action of C on V (a map ). Concretely, this is just an action of i, as this generates the algebra, and the operator representing i (the image of i in End(V)) is denoted J (to avoid confusion with the identity matrix I).
Another important basic class of examples are representations of polynomial algebras, the free commutative algebras – these form a central object of study in commutative algebra and its geometric counterpart, algebraic geometry. A representation of a polynomial algebra in k variables over the field K is concretely a K-vector space with k commuting operators, and is often denoted meaning the representation of the abstract algebra where
A basic result about such representations is that, over an algebraically closed field, the representing matrices are simultaneously triangularisable.
Even the case of representations of the polynomial algebra in a single variable are of interest – this is denoted by and is used in understanding the structure of a single linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space. Specifically, applying the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain to this algebra yields as corollaries the various canonical forms of matrices, such as Jordan canonical form.
In some approaches to noncommutative geometry, the free noncommutative algebra (polynomials in non-commuting variables) plays a similar role, but the analysis is much more difficult.
Eigenvalues and eigenvectors can be generalized to algebra representations.
The generalization of an eigenvalue of an algebra representation is, rather than a single scalar, a one-dimensional representation (i.e., an algebra homomorphism from the algebra to its underlying ring: a linear functional that is also multiplicative).[note 1] This is known as a weight, and the analog of an eigenvector and eigenspace are called weight vector and weight space.
The case of the eigenvalue of a single operator corresponds to the algebra and a map of algebras is determined by which scalar it maps the generator T to. A weight vector for an algebra representation is a vector such that any element of the algebra maps this vector to a multiple of itself – a one-dimensional submodule (subrepresentation). As the pairing is bilinear, "which multiple" is an A-linear functional of A (an algebra map A → R), namely the weight. In symbols, a weight vector is a vector such that for all elements for some linear functional – note that on the left, multiplication is the algebra action, while on the right, multiplication is scalar multiplication.
Since the base ring R is commutative, weights factor through the abelianization of the algebra A (equivalently, they vanish on the derived algebra), and thus the free commutative algebras (the polynomial algebras) are of central interest.
In the case of k commuting operators on an R-module (the polynomial algebra ), a weight is given by a k-tuple of scalars , and the functional is given by In this way weights correspond to points of k-dimensional space – and allow the use of algebraic geometry to study them – just as eigenvalues for a single operator correspond to scalars, i.e., points on the line.